Imagine a future where the very blueprint of Europe's internet could be redrawn—potentially unlocking unprecedented connectivity or, alarmingly, stifling the open innovation we've come to rely on. That's the bold reality facing us with the European Commission's proposed Digital Networks Act (DNA), a sweeping overhaul poised to transform how telecom operators, cloud services, and content providers operate. It's not just about faster speeds or better networks; it's a fundamental reimagining of fairness, competition, and the digital ecosystem that powers our daily lives. Intrigued? Let's dive into what this means for Europeans and why the conversation is heating up now.
Join this exciting hybrid event to explore the potential pitfalls and promising opportunities of the DNA, and engage in a lively debate on crafting a version that genuinely benefits all Europeans moving forward.
Panel 1 – Is Connectivity Really an Unfair Battleground? Fact or Fiction?
Core question: Are regulations crafted primarily for traditional telecom companies appropriately applied to the broader tech landscape?
In their recent white paper addressing Europe's digital infrastructure challenges and the DNA's call for input, the European Commission highlights a growing overlap between telecoms and the tech world, especially in areas like cloud computing and content delivery. Telecom firms are leveraging this to argue for a unified regulatory approach that mirrors their own. But here's where it gets controversial: is this push for convergence truly leveling the playing field, or is it a strategic move that could disadvantage emerging players?
This panel will dissect the key differences in how these sectors operate structurally and functionally, while shining a light on the partnerships that already exist between them. We'll navigate the complex web of current EU regulations to tackle a burning question: Would broadening the scope of the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) to include digital players be essential, equitable, and practically feasible? For beginners, think of it like this—the EECC is like a rulebook for phone and internet providers, but applying it to tech giants could be like using traffic laws for bicycles on highways. We'll explore real-world examples, such as how cloud services like those from Amazon or Google differ from traditional telecom networks, to make this clearer.
Panel 2 – Could the DNA Undermine the Internet's Core Freedom?
Core question: What specific dangers might the Digital Networks Act introduce to the principles of an open internet?
Delving into the actual collaborations between telecoms and tech companies, this panel evaluates recurring risky ideas from the DNA's consultation process and past feedback sessions. A key focus will be on how introducing dispute resolution mechanisms for IP interconnections could morph into charging network fees—potentially altering the internet's fundamental workings. And this is the part most people miss: Experts with direct experience will reveal the tangible impacts on competition, innovation, and everyday users, including how such changes might slow down startups or raise costs for consumers. Imagine a world where accessing online content requires paying extra tolls; that's the kind of shift we're debating here, with examples from past telecom disputes illustrating the risks.
Panel 3 – Shaping the DNA for True European Wins: What's the Blueprint?
Core question: How might we refine the Digital Networks Act to guarantee top-tier connectivity and boost healthy competition?
Cutting through the hype, this panel will analyze the true state of affairs: the financial stability of telecom giants, the progress of network expansions, and the evolving interactions between tech firms and telcos. We'll address ongoing debates fueled by factors like investment shortfalls, skyrocketing data traffic, and the rise of artificial intelligence, plus the telecom industry's calls for mergers. Most crucially, the discussion will weigh legislative options to ensure the DNA empowers European consumers, businesses, and creators effectively. For instance, consider how encouraging fair pricing or mandating open access could prevent monopolies, drawing parallels to successful regulations in other sectors like electricity grids.
Organized by: The Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA Europe)
Media Partner: Euractiv
What do you think—should the DNA prioritize telecom interests at the expense of innovation, or is convergence the key to a stronger digital Europe? Do you see potential for unintended consequences that could harm smaller players? Share your views in the comments; let's spark a discussion on this pivotal topic!
